| Pages: [1] |
1. POSes: I am a small portion of the community - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Some changes would be a huge help. Allowing corporations to allow a member to change modules on one or certain towers without having to allow that member to make changes on all towers would be good. Allowing tech 3 ships to change subsystems at ...
- by E Potato - at 2013.01.17 18:35:00
|
2. R.I.P. V R - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
He was a good poster and a voice of reason. Rest in peace.
- by E Potato - at 2012.09.12 04:05:00
|
3. Sticky:Existing destroyer rebalancing for winter - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I'd like to join many others in suggesting that the 4th mid slot on the Cormorant is a good thing that should stay. It gives a variety of interesting fitting options which are no longer available without it.
- by E Potato - at 2012.09.11 19:25:00
|
4. Why don't we have a radar-like intel interface instead of local/dscan/scan w... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I fear any changes to this, since I think there are a lot of ways it could go wrong. However, I think it would be interesting for CCP to do some brainstorming, and float different ideas with players before implementing them. I do think there are...
- by E Potato - at 2011.09.09 19:23:00
|
5. Why do we need EVEHQ, EFT, Pyfa, etc. -- Why can't this functionality exist ... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I think an in-game fitting tool for analyzing fits without having the ships/modules available would be incredibly useful.
- by E Potato - at 2011.09.09 19:19:00
|
6. When are the ship balances coming? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I've also been wondering about this. Dramiels are preferred over interceptors for the role that interceptors were designed for, months pass, sensible changes are suggested, players agree with them... and then a huge delay. This doesn't even involv...
- by E Potato - at 2011.09.09 18:40:00
|
7. Alliance Logo Neglect - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Yozido wrote: The delay is CCP's way of saying we should have gone with the Rifter sicle. It's a pretty good logo.
- by E Potato - at 2011.09.08 20:47:00
|
8. Ship Maintenance Array Security - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Why is there no fine-grained security on ship maintenance arrays? Corporations are forced to give all or nothing access to members. They can use multiple SMAs, but that's inefficient. They can heavily restrict access, but for POSes that see heav...
- by E Potato - at 2011.09.08 20:46:00
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |